I am conflicted.
But first, thank you for reading my
blogs throughout the campaign. Your support been appreciated. From the
first blog in June until now I had triple the amount of views. The last
blog in February had more than 1500 views. Your messages of support
helped me, and my colleagues, through the campaign.
And here we are.
Conflicted.
In
each blog I was clear - this was never about the money. I said so to
motivate my colleagues, to educate the lay person on why we had to fight
for a better deal, and on why we inconvenienced parents and students
for three-and-a-half days. I meant every single word. More money would
be nice. But I saw this as an opportunity to advance our profession. Our
log of claims had more provisions that would improve our conditions
than it did details about money. I had hope we could take a stand and
push teaching well into the 21st Century. That's why I call it a
profession - it is more than a mere job or career. It is a calling. It
is a noble occupation - one of service and one critical to our
development as a society. The best of us are amongst the kindest, more
generous and selfless people in the country. We deserve to be treated as
such and be able to work in conditions that allow us to excel at our
profession.
My expectations have not changed at all.
That is why I am conflicted. My government and my union do not share my expectations.
The government is only concerned
with where they can save money. That's why they gutted the regional
offices, cut VCAL funding and look to put up performance pay and make it
available to only a fixed amount of staff - regardless of overall
school performance. (Allow me to digress for a moment - performance
standards should be maintained, enforced and developed. Hell perhaps
there should be bonuses. But this is not what the government suggested,
nor did they put up for a model for what the performance standards would
look like. It was dollars and cents - nothing else.) The government has
shown no interest in our welfare or creating conditions that would
allow us to educate every single kid. Instead we will remain overworked
and under resourced. Quite simply - this government does not care about
our students or the people we entrust them too everyday. School
improvement does not fit the election cycle, nor is it sexy for the TV.
Sadly
my union is no better. The campaign was flawed from the start and
treated the public like idiots. Instead of promoting our conditions they
focused solely on the "best paid in the country" election promise.
Politicians lie - especially when seeking re-election. Highlighting this
does not court the public's sympathy or support. And it sets us up for
failure. When you publicly campaign on the prospect of increased wages
you better deliver. The proposed agreement does not give us 30% over
three years. It does not give us all 12% over three years either (our
revised offer). The figures quoted by the union include the automatic
2.75% from the previous agreement (for not having a new agreement by
January 1, 2012). It include the $1000 sign-on bonus. Which is great - I
lost just under $900 in pay for striking. At my current pay level I'll
end up with around 10% more by 2016. Which I will take.
What
I won't take is the conditions. Class sizes are the same (we wanted
them lower). Face-to-face hours are the same (we should have wanted them
lower). There have been changes to the excess rules which will save the
government money because more expensive, experienced teachers will not
be able to transfer to another school if their school downsizes or
closes. This is great news for the thousand graduates looking for a job.
Not so great for the hundreds who have been displaced already. There
have been no changes to the situation with contracts. This was a central
part of our campaign (as it was in 2004 and 2008) and we have made no
progress. Monitoring contracts does not mean a thing - they are
monitored now. Maintaining the status quo is fine if you're satisfied
with the status quo. And here in lies the problem.
The
worst part if the agreement has (as it was in 2008) been presented to
the public as a win. From this there is no turning back. It was released
to members, finally, on Friday afternoon. Confusingly the government
also called it a win and quoted different figures! The public's patience
has been stretched by our strikes, the government's stubbornness and
the fact that a lot of people don't rate what we do.
Here
is the conflict. We vote NO and reject a pretty shitty deal and we
probably spend another year negotiating. The government does not want to give us more money - which is why they have not in the proposed deal. The public will not support us
through more strikes and don't even notice the other bans we had in
place with the exception of reports. The 38 hour week? My school
cancelled exactly one event - and it was one that teachers barely
attended anyway. Teachers don't like to do things that disadvantage
students. Our hearts are just too big. And that's why the campaign is
over.
If we vote YES we accept the deal and the
conditions. This is great if you're fine with how things are now. It is
basically the same. We have made no progress and, to be honest, the
union is not interested in this either. I doubt most teachers are
interested in it. But they should be. We allowed them to run a campaign
about the pay, and allowed factions to debate the place of entertainment
in our rallies. It is time we expect more of ourselves and our
officials.
The answer then lies with the teachers. If
you want to be treated like a professional you need to act like one and
we, as a profession, need start holding each other to a higher standard.
Most importantly we need to hold our government and our union to that
standard. If we want progress then it will come from us. We deserve to
be paid and treated as if we are being entrusted to enrich and develop the next
generation. We must work to convince others, including our union
leaders, that this is what we want.
But not this battle. This campaign is done. We have a government and union that are only interested in dollars and cents.
I am conflicted on how I will vote for this agreement. I don't see the point in voting NO, but barely agree with the YES.
I am clear about what I expect from my government and my union. When the time comes I will vote accordingly on both.
We are a great profession. We need to remind them of it.
I want this profession to move forward. And I will continue to fight for conditions that are better for our children.
Do
me a favour. This week write to a teacher (current or former). You can
find them on facebook no doubt. Express your gratitude. Their union and
our government has kicked them - pick them up again. Trust me, we rarely get
acknowledged for what we do. If you know someone who deserves send them
a quick note.
"People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people."
Thank you for your support.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Monday, April 29, 2013
The best, worst & strange comic book movies
10 that worked -
In order to work they need to both represent the source material fairly and still make the most of the cinematic medium. Ideally a comic book movie will be worthy of a simple title- film. The following films had great directors, Oscar worthy casts, a solid script and an immersive experience that makes the audience believe in heroes. They might be fun but never disrespect the source material or comic book fans.
10. X Men First Class
9. Batman 89
8. X men 2
7. Kick Ass
6. Hell Boy
5. Superman II
4. Spider-Man 2
3. Iron man
2. Avengers
1. The dark knight trilogy
UPDATE: After suggestions on Facebook I need to include The Crow and Blade (actually I rate Blade 2 higher than the first one). These two made comic book movies 'adult' again after the last couple of Batman films pushed them too far into being camp andkid toy friendly. Just outside the top 10 include: Thor, X-Men, Spider-Man, Hell Boy and the awesome (but far different to the source comic) V For Vendetta.
10 that didn't -
Comic book movies that don't work usually have some of the follow characteristics: too many crap villains, a dull plot, uninspired dialogue and usually at least one really strange and misplaced sequence. The featured hero usually strays in a weird way from the source material too. The top one here has them all.
10. Spider-Man 3
9. Wolverine
8. Fantastic Four 2
7. Daredevil
6. Elektra
5. Hulk (ang lee)
4. Catwoman
3. Green lantern
2. Batman & Robin
1. Superman IV
UPDATE: How could I forget SuperGirl? The first Fantastic Four isn't great either but the second one is worse. Ditto Superman 3 - the next one was just dull and a far worse film. Others that would come outside the top 10 include Amazing Spider-Man, Blade Trinity, Jonah Hex, and Judge Dredd (Stallone version), Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III.
10 weird ones that could go either way -
Sometimes a producer deserves credit for trying. Sometimes the source material itself is really tough to fit into a film. 10-6 here gave it a good cracked but were plagued by shitty effects, a pointless plot (ahem 9 & 8), or something just not feeling right. I actually like 1-5. They're pretty bold in their approach but for different reasons didn't quite click with audiences.
10. The Shadow
9. Dredd (2012)
8. Superman Returns
7. Ghost Rider
6. Flash
5. Batman Returns
4. Incredible Hulk
3. Punisher
2. Sin City
1. Watchmen
UPDATE: A few that fit here (good films that were a bit weird or tried too hard and didn't find an audience): The Phantom, Swamp Thing, TNMT (animated film), Spawn, 300, Captain America: First Avenger.
In order to work they need to both represent the source material fairly and still make the most of the cinematic medium. Ideally a comic book movie will be worthy of a simple title- film. The following films had great directors, Oscar worthy casts, a solid script and an immersive experience that makes the audience believe in heroes. They might be fun but never disrespect the source material or comic book fans.
10. X Men First Class
9. Batman 89
8. X men 2
7. Kick Ass
6. Hell Boy
5. Superman II
4. Spider-Man 2
3. Iron man
2. Avengers
1. The dark knight trilogy
UPDATE: After suggestions on Facebook I need to include The Crow and Blade (actually I rate Blade 2 higher than the first one). These two made comic book movies 'adult' again after the last couple of Batman films pushed them too far into being camp and
10 that didn't -
Comic book movies that don't work usually have some of the follow characteristics: too many crap villains, a dull plot, uninspired dialogue and usually at least one really strange and misplaced sequence. The featured hero usually strays in a weird way from the source material too. The top one here has them all.
10. Spider-Man 3
9. Wolverine
8. Fantastic Four 2
7. Daredevil
6. Elektra
5. Hulk (ang lee)
4. Catwoman
3. Green lantern
2. Batman & Robin
1. Superman IV
UPDATE: How could I forget SuperGirl? The first Fantastic Four isn't great either but the second one is worse. Ditto Superman 3 - the next one was just dull and a far worse film. Others that would come outside the top 10 include Amazing Spider-Man, Blade Trinity, Jonah Hex, and Judge Dredd (Stallone version), Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III.
10 weird ones that could go either way -
Sometimes a producer deserves credit for trying. Sometimes the source material itself is really tough to fit into a film. 10-6 here gave it a good cracked but were plagued by shitty effects, a pointless plot (ahem 9 & 8), or something just not feeling right. I actually like 1-5. They're pretty bold in their approach but for different reasons didn't quite click with audiences.
10. The Shadow
9. Dredd (2012)
8. Superman Returns
7. Ghost Rider
6. Flash
5. Batman Returns
4. Incredible Hulk
3. Punisher
2. Sin City
1. Watchmen
UPDATE: A few that fit here (good films that were a bit weird or tried too hard and didn't find an audience): The Phantom, Swamp Thing, TNMT (animated film), Spawn, 300, Captain America: First Avenger.
Labels:
avengers,
batman,
comic book,
dark knight,
fantastic four,
flash,
hell boy,
Iron man,
kick ass,
movie,
sin city,
Spider-Man,
superhero,
superman,
Thor,
watchmen,
wolverine,
x men
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
The importance of friendship at work
In the last episode of The Office (UK) Tim turns to the camera and says this:
"The people you work with are people you were just thrown together with. I mean, you don't know them, it wasn't your choice. And yet you spend more time with them than you do your friends or your family. But probably all you have in common is the fact that you walk around on the same bit of carpet for eight hours a day."
Tim of course runs out into the night to chase the one colleague he could stand walking around on the same bit of carpet with. They make out. It's lovely. The audience had been waiting three years for it to happen.
It is easy to be cynical about the nature of work relationships. Tim is right. Most of our week is spent with people we are just thrown together with. But we don't need to limit ourselves to this lonely and soulless reality. Some of the best moments I've had in my professional life have come from working with people I care about. I've been blessed to meet people I've come to call friends - who I've shared wedding days with, the births of our children, engagements, new houses, new pets, renovations and birthdays. There have been sad times too - funerals, changing jobs, break ups and bust ups. These triumphs and tragedies, unite us, bind us and bring us together. It gives us something share beyond carpet and work. And it's really important we make the effort to know our colleagues.
In The Happiness Advantage, Shawn Achor lists social investment as one of the seven principles that fuels success at work. Achor explains that in times of stress and difficulty at work most people tend to shy away and spend more time 'on work' (even when at home) than they do with people. Research shows that successful people, and by extension organisations, actually strengthen their connection with people during times of high stress. They still take time to laugh and swap stories, to share coffee and have lunch. People who work together on a problem are more likely to solve that problem. Social investment, even just stopping in the hallway and asking someone how they are, is a positive interaction that sparks a moment of happiness. The more of these moments we share, the stronger our social connection and the better we can perform our work.
In each of the places I have worked I have sought to do this. I am not by nature an extrovert. But I like people and I like learning. I really like people who like learning which is a major reason why I've made friends with teachers. Our job is incredibly demanding and rarely acknowledged (at least by government). The friendships I have formed have sustained me through some tough times. Like any profession it is full of politics, pressure to perform and strange traditions. My relationships with the people I work with make it all bearable.
When I was disappointed at not being promoted it was the people around me who pulled me through. They encouraged me, dissected it with me, drank with me. One told me to stop moping and realise the opportunity for what it was - a step forward.
The good times are just as important. At work we celebrate birthdays with a morning tea or lunch. One person's special day is everyone's chance to catch up and descend on the staff room. A few years ago, having made the decision to work the day before my wedding, I arrived to find my desk "wedding bombed". I was still picking glitter out of books eight months later. It will be one of my enduring memories of the place - even as I forget the kids, VCE score and curriculum documents. My recent blog on the trivia team was a collection of colleagues who got together in the middle of school holidays. I've stopped counting all the Strathmore and Rosehill aunts/uncles who have visited my new born.
It is easy to be cynical. It is really hard to be open and honest with our colleagues. But it is worth it. I, for one, can't imagine working in a place where all I shared with people is the carpet. I've managed to achieve a lot in a relatively short amount of time. I know I could not have done any of it without my friends.
Especially the one I ended up chasing, making out with, marrying and having a daughter with. She's one of a kind.
Tim knows what I mean.
"The people you work with are people you were just thrown together with. I mean, you don't know them, it wasn't your choice. And yet you spend more time with them than you do your friends or your family. But probably all you have in common is the fact that you walk around on the same bit of carpet for eight hours a day."
Tim of course runs out into the night to chase the one colleague he could stand walking around on the same bit of carpet with. They make out. It's lovely. The audience had been waiting three years for it to happen.
It is easy to be cynical about the nature of work relationships. Tim is right. Most of our week is spent with people we are just thrown together with. But we don't need to limit ourselves to this lonely and soulless reality. Some of the best moments I've had in my professional life have come from working with people I care about. I've been blessed to meet people I've come to call friends - who I've shared wedding days with, the births of our children, engagements, new houses, new pets, renovations and birthdays. There have been sad times too - funerals, changing jobs, break ups and bust ups. These triumphs and tragedies, unite us, bind us and bring us together. It gives us something share beyond carpet and work. And it's really important we make the effort to know our colleagues.
In The Happiness Advantage, Shawn Achor lists social investment as one of the seven principles that fuels success at work. Achor explains that in times of stress and difficulty at work most people tend to shy away and spend more time 'on work' (even when at home) than they do with people. Research shows that successful people, and by extension organisations, actually strengthen their connection with people during times of high stress. They still take time to laugh and swap stories, to share coffee and have lunch. People who work together on a problem are more likely to solve that problem. Social investment, even just stopping in the hallway and asking someone how they are, is a positive interaction that sparks a moment of happiness. The more of these moments we share, the stronger our social connection and the better we can perform our work.
In each of the places I have worked I have sought to do this. I am not by nature an extrovert. But I like people and I like learning. I really like people who like learning which is a major reason why I've made friends with teachers. Our job is incredibly demanding and rarely acknowledged (at least by government). The friendships I have formed have sustained me through some tough times. Like any profession it is full of politics, pressure to perform and strange traditions. My relationships with the people I work with make it all bearable.
When I was disappointed at not being promoted it was the people around me who pulled me through. They encouraged me, dissected it with me, drank with me. One told me to stop moping and realise the opportunity for what it was - a step forward.
The good times are just as important. At work we celebrate birthdays with a morning tea or lunch. One person's special day is everyone's chance to catch up and descend on the staff room. A few years ago, having made the decision to work the day before my wedding, I arrived to find my desk "wedding bombed". I was still picking glitter out of books eight months later. It will be one of my enduring memories of the place - even as I forget the kids, VCE score and curriculum documents. My recent blog on the trivia team was a collection of colleagues who got together in the middle of school holidays. I've stopped counting all the Strathmore and Rosehill aunts/uncles who have visited my new born.
It is easy to be cynical. It is really hard to be open and honest with our colleagues. But it is worth it. I, for one, can't imagine working in a place where all I shared with people is the carpet. I've managed to achieve a lot in a relatively short amount of time. I know I could not have done any of it without my friends.
Especially the one I ended up chasing, making out with, marrying and having a daughter with. She's one of a kind.
Tim knows what I mean.
Friday, April 5, 2013
Part 3 - Reimagining the Star Wars Prequels
The last installment is here.
There's a neat sequence that provides some nice context to the Bobba Fett-Vader relationship too. I just thought it would be good to establish that prior to Empire Strikes Back. There's also Wookies, Tarkin and we end in a similar place to Lucas' own episode 3. Why? Cuz I actually didn't mind that part of it.
Let me know what you think.
You can read part one here: http://daprano.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/reimagining-star-wars-prequels.html
And part two here: http://daprano.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/reimagining-star-wars-prequels-part-2.html
By the third episode the differences between Obi Wan and Anakin are pronounced. Anakin's lust for power an glory means he ignores the Jedi code in favour of methods that guarantee victory. Obi Wan however continues to follow the code and behave honourably, even as his friend begins to pull away from him. Naturally they must face each other, though I've changed the context from the original Episode 3. Lucas put darth vader's physical state firmly on the shoulders of Obi Wan. My version is a little different. I think Obi wan has seen vader's mask before they cross paths in episode 4 so I've addressed that here. I also thought it was important to address why Obi Wan lies to Luke, so I've tried to do something about that.
I've also added to the Emporer's character in a way that is more fitting to the vibe of the original trilogy. The Empire always gave the appearance they were an entirely human army led by a charismatic dictator. This vibe was lost in the prequels as Palpatine's was surrounded by more colorful advisors.
I've also added to the Emporer's character in a way that is more fitting to the vibe of the original trilogy. The Empire always gave the appearance they were an entirely human army led by a charismatic dictator. This vibe was lost in the prequels as Palpatine's was surrounded by more colorful advisors.
There's a neat sequence that provides some nice context to the Bobba Fett-Vader relationship too. I just thought it would be good to establish that prior to Empire Strikes Back. There's also Wookies, Tarkin and we end in a similar place to Lucas' own episode 3. Why? Cuz I actually didn't mind that part of it.
Let me know what you think.
EPISODE
3: REVENGE OF THE SITH
Over the ocean planet Mon Calamari, a star
destroyer pursues a Corellian cruiser firing on it to slow it down. Fighters
are deployed from underneath to engage the clone fighters. After a skirmish the
star destroyer is successful in slowing the cruiser. Using their tractor beam
them capture the craft and board. Anakin Skywalker leads the storm troopers in
and captures the clone captain. When the captain refuses to cooperate, he uses
the force to choke him into revealing the clone facility on the planet below.
He reports this information to Admiral Tarkin who commences bombing of the
planet. The two communicate the success of their mission to Emperor Palpatine.
With the Clone Army fighting for survival,
the Republic begins to reorganize to ensure their survival in a prolonged
battle. Palpatine grants himself emergency powers to give specific orders to
the military. Padme meets with Bail and Mon Motha to discuss these developments
and agree to present their concerns to Master Yoda.
Anakin returns home with Tarkin and meets
with Padme. The two have continued their affair in private and she is pregnant
with twins. They discuss the new order and Anakin admits he is pleased Palpatine
is seeking to end the war quickly. Padme worries about the direction and admits
to wanting an audience with Yoda. Anakin dismisses her fears as he as fallen
out with the Jedi over his relationship with Palpatine.
Obi Wan finds Anakin training with Boba
Fett. Obi Wan wants a report on Anakin’s mission, which he delivers flippantly.
Noticing the change in his demeanor, Obi Wan senses his fear and asks what is
wrong. He rudely dismisses Fett from the room. Anakin admits to having visions
of Padme’s death. Obi Wan warns him of fear, and encourages him to meditate and
find his balance again. He suggests they retreat together away from the war, a
suggestion Anakin resents. He complains that the council would not recongise
the rank Palpatine has bestowed on him and accuses Yoda of playing favourites.
Palpatine summons Obi Wan to his quarters.
There he offers Obi Wan the chance to replace Yoda as head of the order. Not
willing to betray his master, he declines but realizes Palpatine attempts to
use the Jedi Mind trick. Palpatine flatters Obi Wan and offers to train him so
that he can stand by his side in bringing justice back to the galaxy. Palpatine
orders him to track down Grevious to prove his loyalty. Obi Wan appears to
accept though has been alerted to Palpatine’s use of the force.
Before his departure Obi Wan meets with
Yoda and Padme. He admits to them his suspicions that Palpatine is strong in
the darkside of the force. Padme tells them she has been meeting with Organa
and Motha about the possibility of defeating Palpatine once victory over the
clones is assured. Yoda explains that the future is cloudy and no Jedi has been
able to see it clearly for sometime. Motha unveils the results of her own
research - each of the planets that have
had a clone facility homes a non-human race. Each had won a defense contact,
which had later been proven to clone factory, approved by Palpatine. Palpatine’s
xenophobia has seen him attack only planets with alien races. Sensing a
conspiracy, Obi Wan promises to bring back Grevious alive.
Anakin finds out Obi Wan has been given the
mission and confronts Yoda. Angry that he has again been over looked he quits
the order. He goes to Palpatine who tells him that the Jedi do not see him as
someone capable of wielding unlimited power. He tells him that Obi Wan is
considered the successor to Yoda’s title and that he knows they plan to control
the republic for themselves. Jealous, Anakin pledges his allegiance to the
Emperor and swears to protect his legacy. Palpatine offers to complete his
training and show him things the Jedi would not.
Anakin sends Boba to kill Grevious, telling
him to stop Obi Wan if he interferes.
Obi Wan finds Gervious and after a chase
through the caves is able to corner him. Grevious reveals his lightsaber and
admits to having undergone Sith training. The two duel and Obi Wan forces
Grevious to submit. As he loads him into his ship, Fett appears and uses a
disintegrating gun to assassinate Grevious. Obi Wan chases him but Fett
escapes. Furious, Obi Wan returns to Courscant to confront Anakin.
Anakin announces the defeat of Grevious.
Padme is elated that Obi Wan is victorious but Anakin shoots this notion down,
explaining that he had Grevious assassinated. He dismisses her optimism that
Motha will now take over calling her a traitor. Angry at her weakness he force
chokes her, before releasing her.
The alliance attempt to force a vote
against Palpatine though he is undaunted by the rebellion. Palpatine wins when
other senators refuse to vote against him. He declares there is a Jedi plot to
over throw him and orders the arrest of master Yoda. He introduces his new
commander, Darth Vader, who emerges dressed in a mask and black cloak.
While this is happening, assassins attempt
to kills the leaders of the alliance and a number of Jedi masters. They are
successful in killing most of them, though Mace Windu and Yoda evade capture.
Obi Wan manages to arrive back and protect Organa and Motha- who agree to leave
the planet with Yoda. Windu decides to confront the Sith Lords to aid their
escape. Vader himself kills Windu after a battle in which Vader is badly burned.
He requires extensive robotic surgery that Palpatine organizes.
Having successfully declared himself
Emperor and defeated his local enemies, Palpatine decides to end the clone wars.
He gives Vader and Tarkin the location of the final cloning facility- a planet
known as Kyysshk. From their new base on Dantooee, the Organa and Motha realize
Kayysshk has also received a defense factory and, antipating The Emporer's move, they
send Obi Wan and a rogue squadron of fighters to Kyyyssshk to confront Vader
and restore the Jedi name.
The wookies, who realise the threat posed
by the invading storm troopers, attempt to defend their home planet. The Empire
unleashes their walkers who attack the wookies while Tarkin’s star destroyers
bomb the cloning facility. The Rogue Squadron engage the star destroyers with
limited success.
Inside the facility Vader faces Obi Wan who, despite Vader's face being completely hidden by a mask and helmet, recognises him as Anakin. Obi Wan attempts to reason with his friend but
realises he is overcome with fear and hate. Vader dismisses Obi Wan for trying
to soften him and taunts him for being afraid of solitude and power – a result
of being abandoned as a child. He offers Obi Wan the chance to join him on the
darkside. Obi retorts that his friend is dead so he is alone anyway – he will
not succumb to temptation. Realizing Obi Wan will not join him Vader attacks Obi
Wan. During the battle Obi Wan is successful in injuring Vader. Vader attempts
to use his force lightning but is unable to do so, his physical humanity having
been replaced by wires and gears. Obi Wan seizes the opportunity to remove the
last of Vader’s human legs. Standing over Vader, Obi Wan admits he has been
afraid. He knew Anakin was turning to the dark side but couldn’t confront him. He
apologizes since Anakin’s failure to find balance in the force means he failed
as a teacher and friend.
Having defeated the Rogue Squadron, Tarkin
continues to bomb the facility and villages so Obi Wan escapes, leaving Vader
behind. Vader recovers and is rescued by Storm troopers. The Empire wins and enslaves
the wookies.
On small cruiser the principle members of
the rebel alliance meet. Padme’s wounds are fatal but she asks if Anakin
survived Vader’s assault. Obi Wan replies that Vader murdered Anakin. Yoda’s
gaze indicates he knows this is not the truth but he nods his approval. Padme
clings to life as she gives birth to twins but soon dies. They mourn Padme and
Anakin. Organa agrees to take the girl of the two twins. Yoda and Obi Wan agree
to watch over the male and both go into hiding in separate locations. Motha
returns to Courscant to monitor the Emperor.
The Emperor, a repaired and upgraded Vader and Admiral Tarkin over look the
construction of their new space station- the death star.
Obi Wan delivers the child to his childhood
planet of Tatooee and watches as Owen and Beau Lars take the boy inside. He
dons a brown cloak and retreats into the mountains as the twin suns set.
Labels:
episode I,
episode II,
episode III,
episode VII,
fan fiction,
star wars
Thursday, April 4, 2013
April 4 - The Tale of the Lucky 13
The frustration had been growing. Too many Thursday nights, in the heat and the cold, had ended in defeat. There had been consolation prizes of course - the odd jug of beer, a Jesus Disco Lamp - but nothing that could be considered victory. There were moral victories - the night just three showed up only to lose by the smallest of margins was one moment that is still spoken of with pride. There were 'could have beens' - the failure to recognize 'Complicated' as Avril Lavigne's first single, or forgetting the name of the dog in the Brady Bunch, being talked into naming Suzie Quattro as the voice of 'I Love Rock & Roll'. Such is the life of a trivia team. To compete is to court disappointment and, yes, a difficult life of regret and shame.
So a plan was formed. A plan that would bring glory to each of them. A plan that would end the frustration. A plan so audacious that Danny Ocean himself would walk away without taking a cent. An all in, all star assault on the Lord Newry Hotel's monthly trivia crown. For once invites would be sent two weeks before to rally the troops. The rally cry was simple - Help us win. No exclamation mark, nor all caps, were required. And rally they did. Three returned to the team from time away. New faces joined. The torch bearers, who had more than their fair share of disappointment, all arrived. The Lucky 13, as they were to be known, had assembled.
There was nervous laughter as the host began his opening monologue. Would they be victorious? Did they have all the major knowledge categories covered? There were an awful lot of humanities teachers of course. The first question threw seeds of doubt upon their fragile alliance. Where the hell was Fanny Bay? There was much head scratching, biting of lips and gnawing of teeth. And then the power of the 13 became realized. One of the new comers had been there! With much prompting they recalled the trip and low and behold the state was realized! One point to the Lucky 13!
Their relationships would be tested. There was furious debate as to which hit was Lady Gaga's first single. One declared that this was "Sk8r Boi all over again." No phones were used and the answer was selected. It was wrong but it would not matter. The first round would be won by a solitary point. A jug of beer was the prize and they celebrated clearing this initial hurdle (much like you will celebrate when I stop using cliches and mixing metaphors). The subsequent music round played to the groups strengths with 17/18 scored and another round win. The final round was flawless. Each team member contributed.
And they were made to wait. The ShitHouse Showcase was played before they announced the winner! The tension built. Men headed for the bathroom while women stared stone faced at the host. Finally, after an exhaustive wait (at least as long as it takes for an AFL goal review), the Lucky 13 knew the result.
They had won. Finally they were victorious. Two years of frustration and moral victories ended. They now held the title of Monthly Trivia Champions. Thirteen unique minds who bound together to defeat more than 80 others. It was glorious. They celebrated together before heading separately into the night.
Until next month when they will defend their crown. As David Bowie would say: they are heroes, just for one day.
(You were expecting the final part of the Star Wars remake? Come back over the weekend. You won't be disappointed.)
So a plan was formed. A plan that would bring glory to each of them. A plan that would end the frustration. A plan so audacious that Danny Ocean himself would walk away without taking a cent. An all in, all star assault on the Lord Newry Hotel's monthly trivia crown. For once invites would be sent two weeks before to rally the troops. The rally cry was simple - Help us win. No exclamation mark, nor all caps, were required. And rally they did. Three returned to the team from time away. New faces joined. The torch bearers, who had more than their fair share of disappointment, all arrived. The Lucky 13, as they were to be known, had assembled.
There was nervous laughter as the host began his opening monologue. Would they be victorious? Did they have all the major knowledge categories covered? There were an awful lot of humanities teachers of course. The first question threw seeds of doubt upon their fragile alliance. Where the hell was Fanny Bay? There was much head scratching, biting of lips and gnawing of teeth. And then the power of the 13 became realized. One of the new comers had been there! With much prompting they recalled the trip and low and behold the state was realized! One point to the Lucky 13!
Their relationships would be tested. There was furious debate as to which hit was Lady Gaga's first single. One declared that this was "Sk8r Boi all over again." No phones were used and the answer was selected. It was wrong but it would not matter. The first round would be won by a solitary point. A jug of beer was the prize and they celebrated clearing this initial hurdle (much like you will celebrate when I stop using cliches and mixing metaphors). The subsequent music round played to the groups strengths with 17/18 scored and another round win. The final round was flawless. Each team member contributed.
And they were made to wait. The ShitHouse Showcase was played before they announced the winner! The tension built. Men headed for the bathroom while women stared stone faced at the host. Finally, after an exhaustive wait (at least as long as it takes for an AFL goal review), the Lucky 13 knew the result.
They had won. Finally they were victorious. Two years of frustration and moral victories ended. They now held the title of Monthly Trivia Champions. Thirteen unique minds who bound together to defeat more than 80 others. It was glorious. They celebrated together before heading separately into the night.
Until next month when they will defend their crown. As David Bowie would say: they are heroes, just for one day.
(You were expecting the final part of the Star Wars remake? Come back over the weekend. You won't be disappointed.)
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Reimagining the Star Wars prequels - Part 2
If you haven't read yesterday's blog which featured the rationale for remaking the prequels and the first episode then you can do so here: http://daprano.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/reimagining-star-wars-prequels.html
Having used the first episode to both establish the relationship between Anakin and Obi Wan, and show off Anakin's piloting abilities, it is time to show their differences.
At the end of my Episode 1, Anakin and Obi Wan are victorious. They worked together to save the day. Of course, it was Anakin who saved Obi Wan but he was unable to defeat Darth Maul who managed to escape. Publically at least they are seen as equals. However Obi Wan is promoted ahead of Anakin, a move Anakin mocks. In this Episode the goal is to show why Anakin is tempted to choose a different path to Obi Wan. The audience is left to decide which of the two has behaved heroically.
For sub-plots there is the growing relationship between Padme and Anakin, the partnership between Obi Wan and Bail Organa (which Leia hints at in A New Hope) as well as the first appearances of General Grevious and the Fetts. I always liked in Empire Strikes Back that Bobba and Vader seemed familiar with each other. Some seeds for this are planted in this episode.
The goal with these remakes is to position the characters better for the original trilogy.
Let me know what you think!
Having used the first episode to both establish the relationship between Anakin and Obi Wan, and show off Anakin's piloting abilities, it is time to show their differences.
At the end of my Episode 1, Anakin and Obi Wan are victorious. They worked together to save the day. Of course, it was Anakin who saved Obi Wan but he was unable to defeat Darth Maul who managed to escape. Publically at least they are seen as equals. However Obi Wan is promoted ahead of Anakin, a move Anakin mocks. In this Episode the goal is to show why Anakin is tempted to choose a different path to Obi Wan. The audience is left to decide which of the two has behaved heroically.
For sub-plots there is the growing relationship between Padme and Anakin, the partnership between Obi Wan and Bail Organa (which Leia hints at in A New Hope) as well as the first appearances of General Grevious and the Fetts. I always liked in Empire Strikes Back that Bobba and Vader seemed familiar with each other. Some seeds for this are planted in this episode.
The goal with these remakes is to position the characters better for the original trilogy.
Let me know what you think!
EPISODE
2: THE EMPIRE RISES
A Jedi shuttles descends to a desert planet
Geonosis and lands behind a hill. Anakin Skywalker and Obi Wan Kenobi emerge
wearing Jedi military attire. Anakin comments on Obi Wan’s new rank of general
as they move into a position to observe the installation below.
Below them is a massive plant. Complete
with smoke stacks, the industrial complex is used to produce clones. Obi Wan
radios to their in-orbit command ship that they will move in. The two reach an
air duct that will allow them to enter. Inside they are able to observe and
photograph the production line that incubates clones so they are born quicker.
Anakin comments on the implications of this discovery – the clones will out
number the inexperienced Republic army before long.
They are detected by droids and forced from
their hiding place. Surrounded, they are able to use their force powers (speed,
jump and push) to escape. They agree to split up to make and rendezvous at
their shuttle. Anakin runs into a dead end and is surrounded by warrior
Geonosisians. He takes out his light sabre and attacks them- dismembering all
so that he is able to escape into a hatch. Obi Wan is able to use his force
skills to mind tricks to leave via a side door. The two reunite outside and
head for their shuttle though Obi Wan falls into a pit. With droids and
warriors approaching, Anakin is able to force-lift Obi Wan out of trouble and
uses his force-push to knock away the approaching droids.
Following a chase the two Jedi return to
their shuttle to meet the approaching lander. From the lander giant Walkers
emerge to approach the complex. Obi Wan and Anakin watch from afar as the
Walkers fire on and destroy the complex.
Upon their return to Coruscant they debrief
with their Commander Mace Windu. Both make light of their brushes with trouble
and report the success of the mission. Yoda enters and warns the two that they
must remain mindful of the bigger threat- the two Sith lords who have not been
seen for sometime. Anakin boasts that they would be no match for Obi Wan and
himself, which Yoda does not find amusing so he mocks Anakin’s overconfidence.
In the Senate, the senator for Mustafar
admonishes the decision to attack his allied system – Geonosis. Palpatine
argues that anyone who aids the clones is no friend of the Republic. With an
election looming his speech has taken on a strong nationalist rhetoric. Padme
and Organa exchange worrying glances, as the Mustafar senator is silence by the
cheering senators who support Palpatine’s campaign to be elected High
Chancellor.
Later, Padme meets with Anakin and Obi Wan
to catch up. While they discuss the political climate, something Anakin has
little interest in, the sky turns dark. Sensing a disturbance in the force, the
two Jedi take Padme to the Jedi temple and realize Pirate Clone ships have
filled the sky. The Senate reconvenes. The Jedi plan a strategy as the Senate
prepares an evacuation. It is decided to have Jedi accompany the Senators in
their escape. Anakin accompanies Padme, and Obi Wan accompanies Organa.
Padme and Anakin use Anakin’s star fighter
to escape the new blockade and escape to Naboo. Obi Wan and Bail head to
Dantooee on a commercial ship. Palpatine refuses Windu’s offer to go and
pledges to remain until there is nothing of Coruscant left. With a depleted
reserve, and the majority of Jedi Knights elsewhere, the capital falls quickly
and Palpatine goes into hiding. General Grevious, a part cyborg/alien who leads
the attack, declares victory for the pirate army as they occupy the capital.
Meanwhile on Naboo, Anakin and Padme find a
safe house. Padme admits her attraction to him, but Anakin is unable to
reciprocate due to his Jedi Oath – whci forbids the indulgence of intense
emotions including passion. An assassin eventually finds them and attempts to
kill both. Anakin is able to defeat them easily though not without sustaining
damage to his leg. While nursing him, Padme seduces him and Anakin willingly
accepts. Knowing that they are not safe, Padme decides they must leave, as she
won’t risk damage to Naboo.
At the same time Bail and Obi Wan find
themselves disguised as pirates on Dantooee. Unable to remain incapacitated the
two agree to see what they can find out.
They eventually find themselves recruited into a mission with a weapons
expert known as Jango Fett. They journey to Yavin 4 and attend a pirate
meeting. They are astonished to find a battalion of pirate clones ready for
battle. There they also see plans for a facility that Jango confesses will “win
the war.” The Death Star is a space station that, when built, will destroy all.
Organa doubts the pirates will be able to secure the funds to build such a
station but Obi Wan senses a dark presence nearby. Obi Wan recognizes Darth
Maul and begins to follow him but he evades him. Deciding to return to
Coruscant, the two confront Jango with their true identities and arrest him.
They commandeer his ship, The Slave, and head back home. They allow his son
Bobba to accompany them.
On the outskirts of the system the two
parties meet with senator Mon Motha and Yoda. They receive a message from
Palpatine who asks for reinforcements. Motha has gathered the remnants of the
Republic fleet to take back the capital but has been unable to contact
Palpatine on the surface. Anakin suggests a full assault on Grevious to bring
down the army once and for all. They eventually agree on a more elusive
strategy that should force them from the planet and allow Motha to restore
government. Privately, Obi Wan tells Yoda of Maul and the Death Star.
They use The Slave to approach the system.
Obi Wan notices the closeness between Anakin and Padme but says nothing. The
plan works and they are able to land. Making their way through the Jedi Temple
they find Sidious, Maul and Grevious. Sidious flees but Maul uses his force
powers to bring the roof down, while Grevious throws grenades. Padme and Motha
are injured, while Obi Wan is able to save Organa. Fett is killed when he
attempts to follow the Sith lords. Anakin gives chase to Maul, Obi Wan tracks
down Sidious and Organa tends to the injured women. Bobba and Yoda emerge from
the rubble, though head in different directions. Obi wan is unable to locate
Sideous but finds Palpatine imprisoned and frees him.
Finally, Anakin confronts Maul. They battle
furiously with Anakin the aggressor. He succeeds in relieving Maul of his double-edged
lightsaber, though Maul reveals a second spare one. Maul manages to cut off
Anakin’s hand leaving him defenseless and in agony. Maul offers Anakin mercy –
if he will join him on the darkside. Anakin, enraged by Maul’s renewed taunts,
unleashes a stream of white lighting from his good hand towards his enemy. Maul
is knocked from the platform and falls into the electrical station below. Staring
at his smokey hand he realizes he has avenged his parents and collapses to the ground
in tears cradling his injured arm.
Clone troopers find the weakened Anakin and
attack him. Anakin is able to hold them off, using Maul’s second lightsaber, but finds
himself cornered. When he nudges them away using the force, Bobba appears and
distracts the clones. Anakin beheads them. He gives a knowing wink to the young
boy as they leave the area.
Palpatine uses Anakin’s exploits and “promotes”
him to Jedi Master. Anakin, a hero of the battle, stands at the side of
Palpatine as he wins the election when Mon Motha concedes defeat. He describes
the republic as an unbreakable empire that will now crush the clone menace. Yoda,
Obi Wan and Mace exchanged concerned looks as Padme looks into Anakin’s eyes
across the great hall.
Labels:
clone wars,
episode I,
episode II,
episode III,
episode VII,
film,
remake,
star wars
Reimagining the Star Wars prequels
I don't usually write fan fiction. The very phrase carries with it a plethora of connotations - most of them involving weird sex (think very carefully before you click that link).
But after watching Red Letter Media's Plickett reviews of the Star Wars prequels I did jot down some ideas. (If you haven't seen the reviews set aside a couple of hours and click on that link. It is worth it.)
So I had a little crack at rewriting the prequels based around the following problems:
I didn't think too much about it so many of the planets and characters from the available prequels still appear. I've also tried to show that Leia's father (Bail Organa) served with Obi Wan in the Clone Wars since this is the only reason she messages him in the original film anyway. I've kept Darth Maul and Padme (though her character is much more straight forward). What I did axe was some of the characters who appeared far too often (the trade federation, Count Douku) or in roles they were ill suited (Yoda should not wield a lightsaber. Ever.) There's no droids, Jar Jar or Chewbacca. But there are Wookies and some more background on Boba Fett (though not in the episode below). There's no Han Solo but there's pirates. And a clone war that actually appears in the films - not an accompanying animated series.
What follows is a really rough outline for a remade Episode 1. I'll post the other episodes over the next few days too. Comments and crticisms are more than welcome.
But after watching Red Letter Media's Plickett reviews of the Star Wars prequels I did jot down some ideas. (If you haven't seen the reviews set aside a couple of hours and click on that link. It is worth it.)
So I had a little crack at rewriting the prequels based around the following problems:
- There is no protagonist in The Phantom Menace.
- There is no likeable protagonist in any of the films. Obi Wan just does dumb things that he learned from his dumb master.
- Having C3-PO and R2-D2 around causes more plot headaches than it is worth.
- Jar Jar Binks exists.
- There is actually little action and lots of talking about trade federations and blockades and midichroleans. This stuff, coupled with some really dull characters and directing choices, makes the movies boring.
I didn't think too much about it so many of the planets and characters from the available prequels still appear. I've also tried to show that Leia's father (Bail Organa) served with Obi Wan in the Clone Wars since this is the only reason she messages him in the original film anyway. I've kept Darth Maul and Padme (though her character is much more straight forward). What I did axe was some of the characters who appeared far too often (the trade federation, Count Douku) or in roles they were ill suited (Yoda should not wield a lightsaber. Ever.) There's no droids, Jar Jar or Chewbacca. But there are Wookies and some more background on Boba Fett (though not in the episode below). There's no Han Solo but there's pirates. And a clone war that actually appears in the films - not an accompanying animated series.
What follows is a really rough outline for a remade Episode 1. I'll post the other episodes over the next few days too. Comments and crticisms are more than welcome.
EPISODE
1: THE BALANCE OF THE FORCE
Above Naboo, a Mon Calamari cruiser is
attacked by a pirates. On board is teenager Anakin Skywalker and his parents.
The pirates face off against the security squad of Senator Palpatine of Naboo. Specifically
the leading pirate wears a black, hooded cloak that hides his face. The pirates
are successful in subduing the bridge and begin to clear the decks, looking for
the senator. While ransacking guest quarters, they are stopped by the
Skywalkers who are killed in front of Anakin. Anakin escapes to the dock and
commandeers one of the pirate star fighters. He attacks the pirate ship is able
to out maneuver their fighters. His piloting appears to be on instinct and he is
successful in disabling the pirate ship. Escape pods manage to get away. The
lead hooded pirate escapes without the senator and watches the space battle
from the outskirts of the battle. As a new starship enters the system from
hyperspace he orders his pilot to leave.
Jedi Knights arrive from hyperspace to arrest
the pirates and find the Senator. After hearing details of Anakin’s exploits,
the two Jedi request a meeting him. Believing Anakin to be strong in the Force
they offer to take him with them to Coruscant. He is skeptical, claiming he was
lucky in attacking the ships, but accepts when Palpatine also offers his
support.
On Coruscant Anakin is taken to the Jedi
Temple to meet Master Yoda and his pupil, Obi Wan Kenobi. After testing him
with a Jedi Mind Trick, Yoda allows Obi Wan to train him. That night, Anakin is
invited to a reception hosted by Palpatine, which Obi Wan attends as well.
There they meet Padme Amidala, an ambassador from Naboo and Senator Bail Organa
of Alderaan. Organa expresses his concern at the rising number of pirate
attacks on peaceful systems. Palpatine advocates for a stricter response which
the others disagree with. Both Anakin and Obi Wan take a liking to Padme,
though Obi Wan reminds Anakin of the Jedi oath he will take tomorrow.
Before Yoda and Mace Windu, Anakin takes
his Jedi Oath. He begins his training with Obi Wan on an isolated part of one
of Coruscant’s moon. The training comprises of both physical challenges and
mental puzzles. Anakin is successful in anticipating threats, such as rocks
hurled at him by Obi Wan, but struggles to manipulate other objects such as the
entrance to an ancient temple. At night they discuss fear, as Anakin admits his
frustration at not being able to save his parents. Obi Wan reveals that he was
orphaned as a boy. He resented his parents until a Jedi taught him how to find
balance in the force. Anakin hopes he can find this inner peace.
Elsewhere, the planet Kemino comes under
attack from a pirate army. It is unusual for pirates to attack an entire
planet. Obi Wan is sent to investigate and takes Anakin with him. A pirate army
blockades the planet. Obi Wan is unable to sense their thoughts. Knowing of
Anakin’s exploits above Naboo he entrusts the piloting to Anakin to is able to
breach the blockade and evade the enemy fighters. Landing on Kemino, they make
their way to the capital with Anakin flying through the difficult terrain and
avoiding ground-to-air cannons.
Upon reaching the parliament they realize
why they could not sense their thoughts- the pirate army is made up entirely of
clones. They appear to be under the command of the hooded pirate whom Anakin
identifies, and Obi Wan realizes (from the insignias on his tunic), is a Sith
Lord.
They retreat to contact Yoda and Palpatine.
Palpatine sends Padme to negotiate but she is captured upon entry into the
system. Obi Wan and Anakin see this from their hidden ship and re enter the
capital to save her.
Meanwhile on Coruscant the clone army
arrives and blockades the planet. A second Sith Lord, identifying himself as Darth
Sideous, attacks the High Chancellor and assassinates him. Mace Windu arrives
with the Royal Guard and the army retreats. Under attack from Republic Navy reserves, the Clones
retreat from the system.
On Kemino the Jedi are successful in
freeing Padme and rescuing the Prime Minister. The reserve navy arrives and
engages the clones in battle. The clone army promptly retreat. As they try to
escape, the hooded pirate reveals himself. Darth Maul confronts the Jedi and
Padme. Obi Wan attempts to hold them off and draws Maul into another room. Maul
destroys the door control before defeating Obi Wan with his double edge light
sabre. Obi Wan is injured and left unconscious. Frustrated and sensing Obi
Wan’s pain Anakin angrily uses the force to open the door. Anakin picks up Obi
Wan’s light sabre and attacks Maul fighting him to a stale mate. Maul taunts
Anakin telling him that his parents died because they were weak and that true
power comes from true hate. He uses the force to block Anakin’s path and fires
a lightning bolt towards Anakin. Anakin anticipates the attack and the bolt
misses though Maul escapes. He reunites with Padme as Obi Wan regains
consciousness and the arriving Jedi rescue them.
Having returned to Coruscant, the two Jedi
are awarded honours by Organa and Palpatine for saving Padme. Anakin smiles,
pleased with the recognition, while Obi Wan remains stoned faced and neutral, his emotions balanced in the force.
Labels:
episode I,
episode II,
episode III,
phantom menace,
prequels,
star wars
Monday, April 1, 2013
School Leadership and Kennett's eight year theory
Jeff Kennett's recent declaration that Hawthorn coach Alistair Clarkson should "be sacked or resign" at the end of the year has caused significant discussion in footy mad Melbourne. Is failing to beat Geelong since winning the 2008 AFL Premiership against said team justification for dismissal? Kennett claims the side has underachieved by winning only one Premiership from two grand final appearances since 2004. The merits of this are debatable but I'm interested in Kennett's theory on leadership.
Kennett's stance is that after years of hearing Clarkson's voice the players become numb to a roasting or verbal push. In the world of coaching this is probably true. AFL has a strong culture of unity with rules to prevent players from readily changing clubs. Unlike EPL or NBA coaches (who rarely last as long as he has anyway), Clarkson probably has faced the same players regularly throughout his tenure. Kennett's statement that "six to eight years was as long enough as any coach should stay at a club" is perhaps based on his own failure to win a third term when he was Victorian Premier. He has pulled out a similar number though when discussing AFL CEO Andrew Demetriou's future as league boss. The argument then was that leaders come in fresh and can establish themselves as leaders. Eight year is time enough to lead change and still provide stability. At the eight year mark, again a figure probably chosen based on Kennett's own experience of public office, a leader and their team becomes too familiar and much less effective. Certainly in Demetriou's case, and perhaps Clarkson's, recent form suggests those around them are tired of the same song and dance. Kennett's argument is that a change in leadership after six to eight years can only be good and preempt the decline that a self-satisfied leader might oversee.
So what does this have to do with school leadership? With a new EBA looming perhaps it is time to discuss the role we want leaders to play in schools. Kennett's belief, though there is little research to support it, could have some basis for how we contract and appoint our principals. The current government school principal contract is a standard five years - the same length as the standard strategic plan. Principal's rarely are appointed at the end of the last review period so can spend the bulk to their first contract implementing a plan they had no say in. An eight year contract would allow them time to settle in and participate in a review of the previous five years. Having been through a few reviews there is no better way to get to know the big picture of a school. Then they would be able to set direction and plan for the next five years - all of which they will be around for. In their last couple of contracted years they would begin a new strategic plan to maintain or readjust the school's goals. An eight year contract would provide this stability.
The biggest problem is that principal's do not always leave after their five years (and why would you want them to if they're doing good things in the school?). Two principal contracts would mean sixteen years at the same school instead of ten. As Kennett says though, people become tired of the same voice and the same personality. Change can be good and can be a catalyst for renewal. It can re-energise people who didn't even know they were stagnating. This seems to be the core belief of the American presidential system - it certainly ensures there is a different voice for the State of the Union address at least every eight years.
So perhaps school leaders should be moved on after eight years? It might work. But it would be conditional on a clear appointment process and development program. The current government has stripped principal's of access to these regional resources. No one is perfect - but imagine being stuck with the equivalent of [insert crappy sport coach here] for eight whole years? There's a reason Clarkson will stay at the Hawks and Demetriou will stay as CEO. It is the same reason Collingwood stuck with Mick Malthouse despite taking TEN years to deliver a premiership (what must Kennett make of that success rate?). We prefer the devil we know to the devil we don't - at least when things are going well. There would need to be regular review periods of course and a chance for 360degree feedback. These mechanisms exist in the current system and should be utilized regularly.
A mentor once told me four years was plenty in a school. Perhaps it is sometimes. But sometimes the job is only half done and a second term is necessary. Whether we need a third term is a question worth asking.
I'm on school holidays so I'm hoping I can blog everyday. If the one month old lets me. They won't all be teacher/education/leadership type stuff.
Kennett's stance is that after years of hearing Clarkson's voice the players become numb to a roasting or verbal push. In the world of coaching this is probably true. AFL has a strong culture of unity with rules to prevent players from readily changing clubs. Unlike EPL or NBA coaches (who rarely last as long as he has anyway), Clarkson probably has faced the same players regularly throughout his tenure. Kennett's statement that "six to eight years was as long enough as any coach should stay at a club" is perhaps based on his own failure to win a third term when he was Victorian Premier. He has pulled out a similar number though when discussing AFL CEO Andrew Demetriou's future as league boss. The argument then was that leaders come in fresh and can establish themselves as leaders. Eight year is time enough to lead change and still provide stability. At the eight year mark, again a figure probably chosen based on Kennett's own experience of public office, a leader and their team becomes too familiar and much less effective. Certainly in Demetriou's case, and perhaps Clarkson's, recent form suggests those around them are tired of the same song and dance. Kennett's argument is that a change in leadership after six to eight years can only be good and preempt the decline that a self-satisfied leader might oversee.
So what does this have to do with school leadership? With a new EBA looming perhaps it is time to discuss the role we want leaders to play in schools. Kennett's belief, though there is little research to support it, could have some basis for how we contract and appoint our principals. The current government school principal contract is a standard five years - the same length as the standard strategic plan. Principal's rarely are appointed at the end of the last review period so can spend the bulk to their first contract implementing a plan they had no say in. An eight year contract would allow them time to settle in and participate in a review of the previous five years. Having been through a few reviews there is no better way to get to know the big picture of a school. Then they would be able to set direction and plan for the next five years - all of which they will be around for. In their last couple of contracted years they would begin a new strategic plan to maintain or readjust the school's goals. An eight year contract would provide this stability.
The biggest problem is that principal's do not always leave after their five years (and why would you want them to if they're doing good things in the school?). Two principal contracts would mean sixteen years at the same school instead of ten. As Kennett says though, people become tired of the same voice and the same personality. Change can be good and can be a catalyst for renewal. It can re-energise people who didn't even know they were stagnating. This seems to be the core belief of the American presidential system - it certainly ensures there is a different voice for the State of the Union address at least every eight years.
So perhaps school leaders should be moved on after eight years? It might work. But it would be conditional on a clear appointment process and development program. The current government has stripped principal's of access to these regional resources. No one is perfect - but imagine being stuck with the equivalent of [insert crappy sport coach here] for eight whole years? There's a reason Clarkson will stay at the Hawks and Demetriou will stay as CEO. It is the same reason Collingwood stuck with Mick Malthouse despite taking TEN years to deliver a premiership (what must Kennett make of that success rate?). We prefer the devil we know to the devil we don't - at least when things are going well. There would need to be regular review periods of course and a chance for 360degree feedback. These mechanisms exist in the current system and should be utilized regularly.
A mentor once told me four years was plenty in a school. Perhaps it is sometimes. But sometimes the job is only half done and a second term is necessary. Whether we need a third term is a question worth asking.
I'm on school holidays so I'm hoping I can blog everyday. If the one month old lets me. They won't all be teacher/education/leadership type stuff.
Labels:
aeu,
AFL,
clarkson,
DEECD,
Demetriou,
educational leadership,
hawthorn,
kennett,
leadership,
school
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)